Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholar.ptuk.edu.ps/handle/123456789/978
cc-by
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamara, Rana-
dc.contributor.authorHunter, David-
dc.contributor.authorStobbs, Lorne-
dc.contributor.authorGreig, Neva-
dc.contributor.authorLowery, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorDelury, Naomi-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-12T06:30:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-12T06:30:42Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-11-
dc.identifier.citationSamara, R., Hunter, D. M., Stobbs, L. W., Greig, N., Lowery, D. T., & Delury, N. C. (2017). Impact of Plum pox virus (PPV-D) infection on peach tree growth, productivity and bud cold hardiness. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 39(2), 218-228.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.ptuk.edu.ps/handle/123456789/978-
dc.description.abstractIn 2000, the Dideron (D) strain of Plum pox virus (PPV) was detected in commercial peach and nectarine orchards in the Niagara region of Ontariowhere most of Canada’s stone fruit crops are produced.As part of a diseasemanagement research programme, peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) trees in a commercial orchard at Niagara-on-the-Lake were assayed for PPVannually for 3 years. The orchard consisted of two blocks of the cultivars ‘Allstar’ and ‘Brighton’, of which 4 of 288 and 5 of 252 trees, respectively, were infected with PPV-D. The growth and health of these PPV-infected and non-infected trees were evaluated based on the annual growth rates, vigour (chlorophyll content) and bud winter hardiness. Comparative fruit quantity and quality index valueswere based on total yield andmarketable yield per tree, fruit size and weight, fruit pH, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, flesh firmness, and fruit skin colour. Results from these preliminary studies showed that trees infected with this mild Ontario isolate of PPV produced slightly more fruit of smaller size that ripened earlier than non-infected trees. However, yield efficiencies based on weight of fruit relative to the trunk crosssectional area did not differ statistically. Screenhouse studies on three graft-inoculated fresh market peach cultivars (‘Babygold’, ‘Catherina’, and ‘Garnet Beauty’) similarly did not demonstrate any differences in growth or fruit production in the second and third year post inoculation, but fruit on infected trees matured somewhat earlier.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Agriculture and AgriFood Canada [General account]; National Plum Pox Virus Research Program.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology,en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries39(2), 218-228.;-
dc.subjectBud hardinessen_US
dc.subjectchlorophyll contenten_US
dc.subjectfruit qualityen_US
dc.subjectPlum pox virusen_US
dc.subjectyielden_US
dc.titleImpact of Plum pox virus (PPV-D) infection on peach tree growth, productivity and bud cold hardinessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2017.1336489-
Appears in Collections:Sciences and Agricultural Technology Faculty

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Impact of Plum pox virus (PPV-D) infection on peach tree growth,printed.pdf704.01 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.